4.8 Article

Quantile Context-Aware Social IoT Service Big Data Recommendation With D2D Communication

Journal

IEEE INTERNET OF THINGS JOURNAL
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages 5533-5548

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JIOT.2020.2980046

Keywords

Heuristic algorithms; Device-to-device communication; Internet of Things; Big Data; Receivers; Machine learning algorithms; Image color analysis; Big data; D2D communication; online learning; quantile contextual bandit; recommended system; Social Internet of Things (IoT)

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [61972448, 61802048]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With the rapid development of the Internet-of-Things (IoT) networks, millions of IoT services provided through wireless networks are waiting for people's exploration. Such a large number of heterogeneous IoT services produce huge amounts of data in almost real time, known as big data, many of which cannot be measured or quantified. Hence, a recommended system that aims to deal with the unquantifiable big data is urgently needed. To solve the problem, we propose a novel quantile contextual tree-based multiarmed bandits algorithm to support the large-scale recommendation with both quantifiable and unquantifiable data. Furthermore, the high failure rate of communication has a serious influence on the recommendation accuracy of our system with the widely used D2D technology in today's IoT network. To improve recommendation accuracy under the D2D communication, we take into account the feedback of historical service receivers and the historical successful delivery rate (SDP) of data transmission at the same time for the service recommendation system. We give theoretical analysis to prove a sublinear bound of the regret. Numerical experiments with tremendously large data sets show that we can balance the regret with the system time cost and guarantee a high SDP.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available