4.5 Article

Degradation Behavior of Scalable Nonfullerene Organic Solar Cells Assessed by Outdoor and Indoor ISOS Stability Protocols

Journal

ENERGY TECHNOLOGY
Volume 8, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/ente.202000295

Keywords

organic solar cells; scalable fabrication; transient photovoltage

Categories

Funding

  1. Interreg Deutschland-Danmark
  2. European Regional Development Fund
  3. Southern Denmark Growth Forum
  4. Villum Foundation [13365]
  5. Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond, DFF FTP [8022-00389B]
  6. EU Framework Programme Horizon 2020 [MP1307]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The development of nonfullerene acceptors (NFAs) has led to dramatic improvements in the device efficiencies of organic photovoltaic (OPV) cells. To date it is, however, still unclear how those laboratory-scale efficiencies transfer to commercial modules, and how stable these devices will be when processed via industrially compatible methods. Herein, the degradation behavior of lab-scale and scalable OPV devices using similar nonfullerene-based active layers is assessed. It is demonstrated that the scalable NFA OPV exhibits completely reversible degradation when assessed in ISOS-O-1 outdoor conditions, which is in contrast to the laboratory-scale devices assessed via the indoor ISOS-L-2 protocol. Results from transient photovoltage (TPV) indicate the presence of charge trap formation, and a number of potential mechanisms are proposed for the selective occurrence of this in laboratory-scale devices tested in ISOS-L laboratory conditions-ultimately concluding that it has its origins in the different device architectures used. The study points at the risk of assessing active layer stability from laboratory-scale devices and degradation studies alone and highlights the importance of using a diverse range of testing conditions and ISOS protocols for such assessment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available