4.3 Article

Cryo-EM of human Arp2/3 complexes provides structural insights into actin nucleation modulation by ARPC5 isoforms

Journal

BIOLOGY OPEN
Volume 9, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/bio.054304

Keywords

Arp2/3; Actin; Cytoskeleton; Cryo-EM; Isoforms; Nucleation

Categories

Funding

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/L00190X/1]
  2. Cancer Research UK [FC001209]
  3. UK Medical Research Council [FC001209]
  4. Wellcome Trust [FC001209]
  5. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [810207]
  6. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [grant MuScActin]
  7. BBSRC [BB/L00190X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. European Research Council (ERC) [810207] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Arp2/3 complex regulates many cellular processes by stimulating formation of branched actin filament networks. Because three of its seven subunits exist as two different isoforms, mammals produce a family of Arp2/3 complexes with different properties that may be suited to different physiological contexts. To shed light on how isoform diversification affects Arp2/3 function, we determined a 4.2 angstrom resolution cryo-EM structure of the most active human Arp2/3 complex containing ARPC1 B and ARPC5L, and compared it with the structure of the least active ARPC1A-ARPC5-containing complex. The architecture of each isoform-specific Arp2/3 complex is the same. Strikingly, however, the N-terminal half of ARPC5L is partially disordered compared to ARPC5, suggesting that this region of ARPC5/ARPC5L is an important determinant of complex activity. Confirming this idea, the nucleation activity of Arp2/3 complexes containing hybrid ARPC5/ARPC5L subunits is higher when the ARPC5L N-terminus is present, thereby providing insight into activity differences between the different Arp2/3 complexes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available