4.5 Article

Calibration of Microscopic Penalty Parameters in the Combined Finite-Discrete-Element Method

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMECHANICS
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001686

Keywords

Combined finite-discrete-element; Penalty parameter; Macro-microscopic parameters relationship; Parameter calibration; Uniaxial compression test; Brazilian test

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41731284, 41920104007]
  2. Xiangjiang Scholars Program [XJ2019040]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan) [CUG170657, CUGGC09]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With unique advantages in simulating solid fracture, the combined finite-discrete-element method has become increasingly popular in the rock mechanics field. Nevertheless, a large number of microscopic parameters in the method need to be specified and many of them cannot be directly measured via laboratory tests. Therefore, these parameters must be determined via a calibration procedure. To calibrate appropriate microscopic parameters, we should find the relationship between them and the macroscopic mechanical response. In these microscopic parameters, the normal and tangential penalty parameters play a very important role. Thus, in this paper we study the effect of penalty parameters on macroscopic mechanical parameters in the combined finite-discrete-element method. It is found that as the penalty parameters increase, the elastic modulus and Poisson's ratio gradually approach the experimental values. However, the further increase of penalty parameters has little effect on the elastic modulus and Poisson's ratio when they reach 100 times the elastic modulus. Based on this conclusion, a simple method for the calibration of penalty parameters is proposed, which can be used to quickly determine the penalty parameters according to the uniaxial compression test.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available