4.6 Article

Prediction of Chlorophyll-aConcentrations in the Nakdong River Using Machine Learning Methods

Journal

WATER
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w12061822

Keywords

machine learning; recurrent neural network; long-short-term memory; 1-step ahead recursive prediction; variable selection; water quality; chlorophyll-a

Funding

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [2017R1D1A3B03028084, 2019R1I1A3A01057696]
  2. ICT R&D program of MSIT/IITP [2018-0-01502]
  3. National Institute of Environment Research (NIER) - Ministry of Environment (MOE) of the Republic of Korea [NIER-2019-01-01-038]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many studies have attempted to predict chlorophyll-aconcentrations using multiple regression models and validating them with a hold-out technique. In this study commonly used machine learning models, such as Support Vector Regression, Bagging, Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Recurrent Neural Network (RNN), and Long-Short-Term Memory (LSTM), are used to build a new model to predict chlorophyll-aconcentrations in the Nakdong River, Korea. We employed 1-step ahead recursive prediction to reflect the characteristics of the time series data. In order to increase the prediction accuracy, the model construction was based on forward variable selection. The fitted models were validated by means of cumulative learning and rolling window learning, as opposed to the hold-out technique. The best results were obtained when the chlorophyll-aconcentration was predicted by combining the RNN model with the rolling window learning method. The results suggest that the selection of explanatory variables and 1-step ahead recursive prediction in the machine learning model are important processes for improving its prediction performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available