4.8 Article

Phenotypic Screen with TSC-Deficient Neurons Reveals Heat-Shock Machinery as a Druggable Pathway for mTORC1 and Reduced Cilia

Journal

CELL REPORTS
Volume 31, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107780

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01NS113591, R25NS070682]
  2. Nancy Lurie Marks Family Foundation
  3. American Academy of Neurology Neuroscience Research Training Scholarship
  4. Boston Children's Hospital
  5. Tuberous Sclerosis (TS) Alliance Research Grant
  6. Clinical/Translational Core and Cellular Imaging Cores of the Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Center at Boston Children's Hospital (BCH IDDRC) [U54HD090255]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is a neurogenetic disorder that leads to elevated mechanistic targeting of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) activity. Cilia can be affected by mTORC1 signaling, and ciliary deficits are associated with neurodevelopmental disorders. Here, we examine whether neuronal cilia are affected in TSC. We show that cortical tubers from TSC patients and mutant mouse brains have fewer cilia. Using high-content image-based assays, we demonstrate that mTORC1 activity inversely correlates with ciliation in TSC1/2-deficient neurons. To investigate the mechanistic relationship between mTORC1 and cilia, we perform a phenotypic screen for mTORC1 inhibitors with TSC1/2-deficient neurons. We identify inhibitors of the heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) that suppress mTORC1 through regulation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt signaling. Pharmacological inhibition of Hsp90 rescues ciliation through downregulation of Hsp27. Our study uncovers the heat-shock machinery as a druggable signaling node to restore mTORC1 activity and cilia due to loss of TSC1/2, and it provides broadly applicable platforms for studying TSC-related neuronal dysfunction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available