Evaluating the credibility of anchor based estimates of minimal important differences for patient reported outcomes: instrument development and reliability study

Minimal important differences for improvement in shoulder condition patient-reported outcomes: a systematic review to inform a BMJ Rapid Recommendation

(2019) Qiukui Hao et al.   BMJ Open

Minimum clinically important differences in chronic pain vary considerable by baseline pain and methodological factors: systematic review of empirical studies

(2018) Mette Frahm Olsen et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

The anchor-based minimal important change, based on receiver operating characteristic analysis or predictive modeling, may need to be adjusted for the proportion of improved patients

(2017) Berend Terluin et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Minimally Important Differences in Patient or Proxy-Reported Outcome Studies Relevant to Children: A Systematic Review

(2017) Shanil Ebrahim et al.   PEDIATRICS

Application of minimal important differences in degenerative knee disease outcomes: a systematic review and case study to inform BMJ Rapid Recommendations

(2017) Tahira Devji et al.   BMJ Open

Examining the Minimal Important Difference of Patient-reported Outcome Measures for Individuals with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Model Using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score

(2016) Kathryn A.G. Mills et al.   JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY

Minimal important change (MIC) based on a predictive modeling approach was more precise than MIC based on ROC analysis

(2015) Berend Terluin et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Minimal Clinically Important Difference

(2014) Anna E. McGlothlin et al.   JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION

Health-related quality of life of patients with advanced breast cancer treated with everolimus plus exemestane versus placebo plus exemestane in the phase 3, randomized, controlled, BOLERO-2 trial

(2013) Howard A. Burris et al.   CANCER

Patient-reported outcomes in meta-analyses --Part 2: methods for improving interpretability for decision-makers

(2013) Bradley C Johnston et al.   Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

Applying Concepts of Responsiveness to Patient Management in Neurologic Physical Therapy

(2013) Marianne Beninato et al.   Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy

A Framework for Managing the Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Clinical Trials

(2013) Denitsa Koynova et al.   Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science

What Does/Should the Minimum Clinically Important Difference Measure?

(2012) Robert J. Gatchel et al.   CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN

Test–Retest, Responsiveness, and Minimal Important Change of the Ability to Perform Physical Activities of Daily Living Questionnaire in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes and Obesity

(2012) Risa P. Hayes et al.   Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics

New methods can extend the use of minimal important difference units in meta-analyses of continuous outcome measures

(2012) Bradley C. Johnston et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Clinically relevant, statistically significant, or both? Minimal important change in the individual subject revisited

(2011) Georg Kemmler et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Specific instructions for estimating unclearly reported blinding status in randomized trials were reliable and valid

(2011) Elie A. Akl et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

A point of minimal important difference (MID): a critique of terminology and methods

(2011) Madeleine T King   Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research

Improving the interpretation of quality of life evidence in meta-analyses: the application of minimal important difference units

(2010) Bradley C Johnston et al.   Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

Determining a Minimum Clinically Important Difference Between Treatments for a Patient-Reported Outcome

(2010) Simon Kirby et al.   Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics

Global Perceived Effect scales provided reliable assessments of health transition in people with musculoskeletal disorders, but ratings are strongly influenced by current status

(2010) Steven J. Kamper et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Psychometric Evaluation of the FACT Colorectal Cancer Symptom Index (FCSI-9): Reliability, Validity, Responsiveness, and Clinical Meaningfulness

(2010) H. H. Colwell et al.   ONCOLOGIST

The role of the minimum clinically important difference and its impact on designing a trial

(2010) Christy Chuang-Stein et al.   PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS

The variability in minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptomatic state values did not have an impact on treatment effect estimates

(2009) Florence Tubach et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Mind the MIC: large variation among populations and methods

(2009) Caroline B. Terwee et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Three ways to quantify uncertainty in individually applied “minimally important change” values

(2009) Henrica C.W. de Vet et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

The minimal detectable change cannot reliably replace the minimal important difference

(2009) Dan Turner et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Systematic Review of Measures of Clinical Significance Employed in Randomized Controlled Trials of Drugs for Dementia

(2009) Frank J. Molnar et al.   JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY

Using the entire cohort in the receiver operating characteristic analysis maximizes precision of the minimal important difference

(2008) Dan Turner et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes

(2007) Dennis Revicki et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY