4.0 Review

SEED TRAITS AND GERMINATION IN THE CACTACEAE FAMILY: A REVIEW ACROSS THE AMERICAS

Journal

BOTANICAL SCIENCES
Volume 98, Issue 3, Pages 417-440

Publisher

SOC BOTANICA MEXICO
DOI: 10.17129/botsci.2501

Keywords

Dormancy; photoblasticism; seed bank; serotiny; temperature; viviparity

Categories

Funding

  1. National Botanical Garden
  2. Cuban Botanical Society
  3. Planta!

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Cactaceae is the fifth taxonomic group with the highest proportion of threatened species. One way to contribute to the preservation of this family is to understand the processes that promote seed germination. Questions: How common is dormancy and seed banks in Cactaceae? Are there general patterns in cacti germination response to temperature, light, water, salinity, phytohormones, hydration/dehydration cycles, mechanical or chemical scarification? Data description: A total of 333 studies on cactus germination with information on 409 taxa. Study site and dates: since 1939 to January 2020. Methods: A search of scientific articles in Google Scholar was performed with the words Cactaceae, cacti and cactus, in combination with various matters on germination in English, Spanish and Portuguese. Results: The main germination studies in cactus deal with photoblasticism (275 taxa), temperature (205 taxa) and seed longevity (142 taxa). Other lines of study in cactus germination (e.g., desiccation tolerance, vivipary, phytohormones, mechanical or chemical scarification, in vitro germination, hydration/dehydration cycles, water and saline stress, serotiny, storage in cold, high temperature tolerance and soil seed bank) include between 14 and 65 taxa. Cacti have only physiological dormancy and optimal germination for most species occur between 20 and 30 degrees C. Conclusions: Mexico, Brazil and Argentina are the three leading countries in the study of cactus germination.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available