4.6 Article

Single-channel EEG measurement of engagement in virtual rehabilitation: a validation study

Journal

VIRTUAL REALITY
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages 357-366

Publisher

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s10055-020-00460-8

Keywords

Engagement; Presence; Electroencephalogram; Rehabilitation; Virtual reality

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined a neurophysiological measure of engagement in healthy adults and found that increased frontal theta power is a valid measure of user engagement in virtual reality simulation and participation.
Stroke rehabilitation suffers from low levels of patient engagement, impeding recovery. Virtual rehabilitation (VR) approaches can improve patient outcomes; however, there is limited understanding of the participant's user experience and the field lacks a validated, objective measure of VR engagement. A neurophysiological measure of engagement in healthy adults was therefore examined, to inform future clinical studies. Twenty-four participants (M(age)26.7 years, range 18-47) interacted with a tabletop VR system (ElementsDNA, or EDNA), after which they rated their experience on the presence questionnaire (PQ). Separately, participants completed tasks eliciting low (restingeyes-open and -closed) and high (EDNA VR and roller coastersimulation) levels of engagement while continuous electroencephalogram (EEG) was recorded from a single, left pre-frontal electrode. EEG differences between therestingandsimulationconditions included an increase in theta power (p < 0.01) and a decrease in alpha power (p < 0.01). Importantly, theta power insimulationconditions correlated with PQ scores expressing the hands-on EDNA VR experience (r(s) = 0.38-0.48). In conclusion, the current results provide proof of concept that increased frontal theta power in healthy adults provides a valid measure of user engagement in VR simulation and participation. As the practical potential of VR is increasingly realised in stroke rehabilitation, objective EEG-based measures of engagement may provide a convenient and sensitive technique to assist in evaluating these interventions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available