4.7 Article

Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and breast cancer risk: analysis by subtype and potential interactions

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-70077-z

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. FIS [ISCIII/PI12/02125]
  2. Cofinanciado FEDER Accion Estrategica de Salud del Instituto de Salud Carlos III [PI17/00918]
  3. FIS Intrasalud [PI13/01136]
  4. Programa Grupos Emergentes, Oncology and Genetics Unit, CHUVI Vigo Hospital, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain
  5. Conselleria de Industria Programa Sectorial de Investigacion Aplicada, PEME I+D e I+D Suma del Plan Gallego de Investigacion, Desarrollo e Innovacion Tecnologica de la Conselleria de Industria de la Xunta de Galicia, Spain [10CSA012E]
  6. Conselleria de Cultura, Educacion e Ordenacion Universitaria [ED431G/08]
  7. [EC11-192]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multiple studies have found the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) to be associated with adverse breast cancer (BC) prognosis and survival. Very limited data exist on the role of NLR and risk of BC. The BREOGAN study is a population-based case-control study conducted in Galicia, Spain. We examined the WBC- and NLR-BC relationships. The risk of BC increased with increasing levels of neutrophils percentage (NE%) (multivariable OR for the highest category (95% CI) = 2.14 (1.39-3.32), P-trend < 0.001) and of the NLR (multivariable OR for the highest category (95% CI) = 1.93 (1.26-2.97), P-trend < 0.001). Lymphocytes absolute (L#) and percentage (L%) were associated with a decreased risk of BC (multivariable OR for the highest category (95% CI) = 0.54 (0.35-0.83), and 0.51 (0.33-0.79), P-trend = 0.001 and < 0.001, respectively). The NLR-BC association was more pronounced among Luminal A BC (multivariable OR for the highest category (95% CI) = 2.00 (1.17-3.45), P-trend < 0.001), HER2-negative BC (multivariable OR for the highest category (95% CI) = 1.87 (1.16-3.02), P-trend < 0.001), and those with high total cholesterol and low-H2O2 levels.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available