4.7 Article

Wave attenuation in the shallows of San Francisco Bay

Journal

COASTAL ENGINEERING
Volume 114, Issue -, Pages 159-168

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2016.03.008

Keywords

Wave attenuation; Wave friction factor; Cohesive sediment; Mudflats

Funding

  1. US Geological Survey Coastal and Marine Geology Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Waves propagating over broad, gently-sloped shallows decrease in height due to frictional dissipation at the bed. We quantified wave-height evolution across 7 km of mudflat in San Pablo Bay (northern San Francisco Bay), an environment where tidal mixing prevents the formation of fluid mud. Wave height was measured along a cross shore transect (elevation range 2 m to + 0.45 m MLLW) in winter 2011 and summer 2012. Wave height decreased more than 50% across the transect. The exponential decay coefficient lambda was inversely related to depth squared (lambda= 6 x 10(-4)h(-2)). The physical roughness length scale k(b), estimated from near-bed turbulence measurements, was 3.5 x 10(-3)m in winter and 1.1 x 10(-2)m in summer. Estimated wave friction factor (f) over cap (w) determined from wave-height data suggests that bottom friction dominates dissipation at high Re-w but not at low Re-w. Predictions of near-shore wave height based on offshore wave height and a rough formulation for f(w) were quite accurate, with errors about half as great as those based on the smooth formulation for f(w). Researchers often assume that the wave boundary layer is smooth for settings with fine-grained sediments. At this site, use of a smooth f(w) results in an underestimate of wave shear stress by a factor of 2 for typical waves and as much as 5 for more energetic waves. It also inadequately captures the effectiveness of the mudflats in protecting the shoreline through wave attenuation. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available