4.7 Article

Fibronectin extra domain A (FN-EDA) elevates intraocular pressure through Toll-like receptor 4 signaling

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-66756-6

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute of Health [R25GM125587, R01EY02652, R01EY026529]
  2. Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc. [R35HL139926, RO1NS109910, U01NS113388]
  3. American Heart Association [18EIA33900009]
  4. Core Grant for Vision Research from the National Institue of Health [P30 EY016665]
  5. NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE [R01EY026529] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) is a major risk factor for the development and progression of primary open angle glaucoma and is due to trabecular meshwork (TM) damage, which leads to impaired aqueous humor outflow. Here, we explore a novel molecular mechanism involved in glaucomatous TM damage. We investigated the role of an endogenous Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) ligand, fibronectin-EDA (FN-EDA), in TGF beta 2-induced ocular hypertension in mice. We utilized transgenic mouse strains that either constitutively express only FN containing the EDA isoform or contain an EDA-null allele and express only FN lacking EDA, with or without a mutation in Tlr4, in our inducible mouse model of ocular hypertension by injection of Ad5.TGF beta 2. IOP was measured over time and eyes accessed by immunohistochemistry for total FN and FN-EDA expression. Constitutively active EDA caused elevated IOP starting at 14 weeks of age. Ad5.TGF beta 2 induced ocular hypertension in wildtype C57BL/6J mice and further amplified the IOP in constitutively active EDA mice. TLR4 null and EDA null mice blocked Ad5.TGF beta-induced ocular hypertension. Total FN and FN-EDA isoform expression increased in response to Ad5.TGF beta 2. These data suggest that both TLR4 and FN-EDA contribute to TGF beta 2 induced ocular hypertension.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available