4.7 Review

Low Vitamin D Levels and Frailty Status in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Journal

NUTRIENTS
Volume 12, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu12082286

Keywords

frailty; meta-analysis; older adults; systematic review; vitamin D

Funding

  1. Xunta de Galicia [ED431B 2019/02]
  2. Ministerio de Educacion, Cultura y Deporte [BEAGAL18/00142, PRX19/00353]
  3. Deputacion Provincial de A Coruna

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Serum vitamin D deficiency is widespread among older adults and is a potential modifiable risk factor for frailty. Moreover, frailty has been suggested as an intermediate step in the association between low levels of vitamin D and mortality. Hence, we conducted a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis to test the possible association of low concentrations of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D), a marker of vitamin D status, with frailty in later life. We reviewed cross-sectional or longitudinal studies evaluating populations of older adults and identifying frailty by a currently validated scale. Meta-analyses were restricted to cross-sectional data from studies using Fried's phenotype to identify frailty. Twenty-six studies were considered in the qualitative synthesis, and thirteen studies were included in the meta-analyses. Quantitative analyses showed significant differences in the comparisons of frail (standardized mean difference (SMD)-1.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) (-2.47, -0.15),p= 0.0271) and pre-frail (SMD-0.79, 95% CI (-1.58, -0.003),p= 0.0491) subjects vs. non-frail subjects. Sensitivity analyses reduced heterogeneity, resulting in a smaller but still highly significant between-groups difference. Results obtained indicate that lower 25(OH)D levels are significantly associated with increasing frailty severity. Future challenges include interventional studies testing the possible benefits of vitamin D supplementation in older adults to prevent/palliate frailty and its associated outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available