4.8 Article

An assessment of community-based adaptation initiatives in the Pacific Islands

Journal

NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages 628-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41558-020-0813-1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council Linkage grant [LP160100941]
  2. Australian Research Council [LP160100941] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For the Pacific Islands, community-based adaptation activities are crucial, and yet it remains uncertain whether they are effectively promoting long-term adaptive capacity. Here we evaluate the performance of 32 community-based adaptation initiatives across 20 rural communities in the Pacific. We find that initiative appropriateness was a strength while sustainability was a consistent issue, locally funded initiatives and those implemented by non-governmental organizations were more likely to perform better, and climate awareness-raising initiatives and those integrated with ecosystem-based adaptation performed best. We also identify four multidimensional and interdependent optimization points for future community-based adaptation initiatives: local approval and ownership, shared access to and benefit from initiatives, integration of local realities, and systems-thinking and forward planning. Our analysis suggests the need for a praxis shift whereby adaptation is locally led, communities drive their own agendas, and donors and implementers become facilitators that resource the diverse capacities of communities and help achieve local objectives equitably. Community-based adaptation, in principle, leverages existing local knowledge, capabilities and priorities, but it is unclear what factors drive its success or lack thereof. Here the authors evaluate 32 community-based adaptation initiatives in the Pacific Islands and identify key optimization points for future initiatives.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available