4.6 Article

An Electrically Rechargeable Zinc/Air Cell with an Aqueous Choline Acetate Electrolyte

Journal

MATERIALS
Volume 13, Issue 13, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma13132975

Keywords

zinc; air battery; choline acetate; Bi-functional spinel catalyst; Oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) - oxygen evaluation reaction (OER) activity

Funding

  1. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) (6.Energieforschungsprogram, LuZi) [03SF0499B]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Due to the feasibility of an electrically rechargeable zinc/air cell made of a zinc foil as active material, an aqueous choline acetate (ChAcO) mixture as an electrolyte and a spinel MnCo2O4(MCO) and NiCo2O4(NCO) as a bi-functional oxygen catalyst was investigated in this work. The 30 wt.% water-containing aqueous ChAcO solution showed high contact angles close to those of KOH favoring triple-phase boundary formation in the gas diffusion electrode. Conductivity and pH value of 30 wt.% H2O/ChAcO amounted to 5.9 mS cm(-1)and 10.8, respectively. Best results in terms of reversible capacity and longevity of zinc/air cell were yielded during 100 h charge/discharge with the MnCo2O4(MCO) air electrode polarization procedure at 100 mu A cm(-2)(2.8 mA g(zinc)(-1)). The corresponding reversible capacity amounted to 25.4 mAh (28% depth of discharge (DOD)) and the energy efficiency ranged from 29-54% during the first and seventh cycle within a 1500 h polarization period. Maximum active material utilization of zinc foil at 100 mu A cm(-2)was determined to 38.1 mAh (42% DOD) whereas a further charging step was not possible due to irreversible passivation of the zinc foil surface. A special side-by-side optical cell was used to identify reaction products of the zinc/air system during a single discharge step in aqueous ChAcO that were identified as Zn(OH)(2)and ZnO by Raman analysis while no carbonate was detected.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available