Journal
CLINICAL TRIALS
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages 519-526Publisher
SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1740774516656579
Keywords
Pragmatic trials; mismeasured outcomes; misclassification; claims data; Medicare linkage
Categories
Funding
- NHLBI NIH HHS [U01 HL122280, U01 HL122273, HHSN268201100046C] Funding Source: Medline
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background: To reduce research costs in the context of pragmatic trials, consideration is given to using administrative data (Medicare claims) to ascertain clinical outcomes. Methods: In the historical context of the Women's Health Initiative, the correspondence between selected cardiovascular events derived from Medicare claims was compared to those documented and adjudicated in this large-scale prevention trial. Results: Classification performance varies somewhat by type of outcome, but hazard ratios and confidence intervals derived from the two data sources were quite comparable. Conclusion: These encouraging results provided the needed support to launch a new embedded pragmatic trial of physical activity that will rely heavily on Medicare claims to ascertain cardiovascular disease incidence in the majority of those randomized.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available