4.3 Article

Structural Impacts, Carbon Losses, and Regeneration in Mangrove Wetlands after Two Hurricanes on St. John, US Virgin Islands

Journal

WETLANDS
Volume 40, Issue 6, Pages 2397-2412

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13157-020-01313-5

Keywords

Aboveground carbon; Recovery; Soil carbon; Soil nitrogen; Total ecosystem carbon; Tropical cyclone

Funding

  1. Virgin Islands Established Program to Stimulate Competitive Research (VI EPSCoR)
  2. U.S. Geological Survey Environments Program
  3. LandCarbon Program
  4. Climate Research and Development Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hurricanes Irma and Maria ravaged the mangroves of St. John, U.S. Virgin Islands, in 2017. Basal area losses were large (63-100%) and storm losses of carbon associated with aboveground biomass amounted to 11.9-43.5 Mg C/ha. Carbon biomass of dead standing trees increased 8.1-18.3 Mg C/ha among sites, and carbon in coarse woody debris on the forest floor increased 1.9-18.2 Mg C/ha, with effects varying by mangrove typology. While St. John has only similar to 45 ha of mangroves, they exist as isolated basins, salt ponds, and fringe mangroves; the latter sometimes support diverse marine communities. Salt pond and fringe mangroves had proportionately more organic carbon (46.3 Mg C/ha) than inorganic carbon (1.1 Mg C/ha) in soils than isolated basins. Soil organic carbon was also appreciable in isolated basins (30.8 Mg C/ha) but was matched by inorganic C (36.7 Mg C/ha), possibly due to adjacent land use history (e.g., road construction), previous storm overwash, or geomorphology. Soil nitrogen stocks were low across all typologies. Mangroves had limited regeneration 26 months after the storms, and recovery on St. John may be hindered by pre-storm hydrologic change in some stands, and potential genetic bottlenecks and lack of propagule sources for expedient recovery in all stands.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available