4.7 Article

Sliding wear of cold sprayed Ti6Al4V coatings: Effect of porosity and normal load

Journal

WEAR
Volume 450, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2020.203268

Keywords

Cold spray; Ti alloys; Porosity; Sliding wear; Third bodies; Subsurface microstructure

Funding

  1. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC), Canada : Strategic Grants Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ti6Al4V coatings were made from spherical and irregular powders manufactured using plasma gas atomization and Armstrong processes, respectively. The coatings, made from the two different powders, were distinctly different in terms of porosity content and hardness. Sliding wear tests were performed at different normal loads on both Ti6Al4V coatings. Despite low porosity and high hardness, irregular powder (IP) deposited coatings showed higher wear rates compared to spherical powder (SP) deposited coatings. In case of IP coatings, abrasive ploughing by the wear debris led to high wear rates, whereas presence of porosity in SP coatings, entrapped the wear debris generated during sliding and decreased the wear rate. Increase in normal load led to a decrease in wear rate and CoF in both coatings. The decrease in wear rate was due to tribo-oxidation in IP coatings whereas the combined effect of entrapment of debris along with tribo-oxidation resulted in much lower wear rates in SP coatings. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis showed that the third bodies filled in the pores consisted of highly deformed material with ultrafine grain microstructure and micron sized particles from the counterface while the wear track had comparatively coarse grain microstructure. Results indicated that despite low hardness of SP Ti6Al4V coatings, presence of porosity facilitated for the entrapment of wear debris generated from first bodies which inhibited abrasive ploughing and contributed to low wear rates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available