4.6 Article

Semantic-aware label placement for augmented reality in street view

Journal

VISUAL COMPUTER
Volume 37, Issue 7, Pages 1805-1819

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00371-020-01939-w

Keywords

Label placement; Augmented reality; Guidance map; Street view; Image-based layout

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61802109, 61902109]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper introduces a label placement technique for AR in street view scenarios, which addresses the challenge of placing labels in a clear and readable way without occluding critical information. By identifying important image regions through a novel feature map called guidance map, the proposed method improves label placement in street view AR applications.
In an augmented reality (AR) application, placing labels in a manner that is clear and readable without occluding the critical information from the real world can be a challenging problem. This paper introduces a label placement technique for AR used in street view scenarios. We propose a semantic-aware task-specific label placement method by identifying potentially important image regions through a novel feature map, which we refer to asguidance map. Given an input image, its saliency information, semantic information and the task-specific importance prior are integrated in the guidance map for our labeling task. To learn the task prior, we created a label placement dataset with the users' labeling preferences, as well as use it for evaluation. Our solution encodes the constraints for placing labels in an optimization problem to obtain the final label layout, and the labels will be placed in appropriate positions to reduce the chances of overlaying important real-world objects in street view AR scenarios. The experimental validation shows clearly the benefits of our method over previous solutions in the AR street view navigation and similar applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available