4.5 Article

Analysis of FDA's IQOS marketing authorisation and its policy impacts

Journal

TOBACCO CONTROL
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages 413-421

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055585

Keywords

electronic nicotine delivery devices; non-cigarette tobacco products; public policy; tobacco industry

Funding

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [U54HL147127]
  2. Food and Drug Administration Center for Tobacco Products
  3. University of California

Ask authors/readers for more resources

After analyzing FDA's review of PMPSA's application, relevant law and guidance on PMTAs, and independent research on IQOS health impacts, it was found that the evidence submitted did not demonstrate long-term disease risk reduction, and that IQOS aerosol emits toxins with carcinogenic and genotoxic potential. Despite recommendations from FDA scientists and independent research showing serious risks associated with IQOS, FDA concluded that it is 'appropriate for the protection of the public health', which may have significant health impacts and undermine public confidence in future PMTA decisions.
Background Philip Morris Products SA (PMPSA) submitted a premarket tobacco application (PMTA) to US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) seeking an order permitting it to market IQOS in the USA. US law requires FDA to deny marketing authorisation if applicants fail to demonstrate that their product is 'appropriate for the protection of the public health'. FDA issued a marketing order for IQOS in April 2019, which Philip Morris is using to promote IQOS outside the USA. Methods We analysed FDA's Technical Project Lead Review and marketing order for IQOS, relevant law and guidance on PMTAs and independent research on the health impacts of IQOS. Results FDA found that the evidence PMPSA submitted did not demonstrate reduction in long-term disease risks and that IQOS aerosol emits toxins with carcinogenic and genotoxic potential, some at higher levels than conventional cigarettes. PMPSA did not appropriately consider the health impacts of dual use, the product's attractiveness to youth or data showing that consumers do not accurately perceive the addiction risks of IQOS. Despite FDA's own scientists' recommendations and independent research showing that IQOS presents serious risks to users including cytotoxic, genotoxic, hepatotoxic, cardiovascular and pulmonary risks, FDA concluded that IQOS is 'appropriate for the protection of the public health'. Conclusion FDA's decision allowing IQOS to be marketed in the USA disregarded valid scientific evidence and misapplied the public health standard mandated by law. This decision may have important health impacts, influence marketing IQOS outside the USA and erode public confidence in FDA's future PMTA decisions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available