4.4 Article

Indel variants within thePRLandGHRgenes associated with sheep litter size

Journal

REPRODUCTION IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS
Volume 55, Issue 11, Pages 1470-1478

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/rda.13796

Keywords

growth hormone receptor (GHR) gene; indel polymorphisms; litter size; prolactin (PRL) gene; sheep

Funding

  1. Northwest AF University [K4030320132]
  2. Tianjin Aoqun Sheep Industry Academy Company [K4030320132]
  3. ten agricultural characteristic industries in Jinan [201901]
  4. Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Project of Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences [CXGC2018E10]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Growth hormone and prolactin belong to the class of peptide hormones that have a wide range of regulatory functions. In this study, polymorphisms of growth hormone receptor (GHR) and prolactin (PRL) genes were analysed as candidate genes, which are responsible for the litter size in Australian White (AUW) sheep. According to the statistical analyses results, the polymorphism information content (PIC) values of the PRL-P1-ins-23 bp, GHR-P2-del-23 bp and GHR-P8-del-23 bp were 0.371, 0.366 and 0.375, respectively, which indicates the high genetic polymorphism in AUW sheep. Moreover, all indel loci are not conformed to the HWE (p < .05). Further, our findings revealed that the PRL-P1-ins-23 bp polymorphism in the ovinePRLgene was significantly related to the first parity litter size (p = .001) and the DD genotype displaying the highest genotypic mean. Meanwhile, the GHR-P2-del-23 bp and GHR-P8-23 bp indels in the ovineGHRgene were significantly correlated with first parity litter size (p < .05), and the individuals with the genotype II showed significantly higher litter size than others. Collectively, these results demonstrated that our findings could be useful for future sheep breeding strategies based on the molecular-assisted selection (MAS).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available