4.3 Article

Effect of drop weight impact on the torsional-loading behavior of filament wound and prepreg-wrapped composite tubes

Journal

POLYMERS & POLYMER COMPOSITES
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages 617-628

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0967391120930107

Keywords

Glass fiber; impact behavior; mechanical properties; filament winding; prepreg

Funding

  1. Manisa Celal Bayar University Scientific Research Projects Unit (BAP) [2016-107]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study experimentally investigated the torsional behavior and impact resistance of composite tubes with different winding angles. The results indicated that the sample with a winding angle of 60 degrees showed the best impact performance in terms of absorbed energy, while samples with 60 and 75 degrees winding angles exhibited the lowest torsional strength at each energy level.
This article presents an experimental study on the torsional behavior of composite tubes subjected to impact loadings. Four types of composite tubes with the winding angle of 30 degrees, 45 degrees, 60 degrees, and 75 degrees ([+/- 30](FW), [+/- 45](FW), [+/- 60](FW), and [+/- 75](FW)) were produced with the filament winding method. Besides, a [0,90](PP) composite tube was manufactured with the prepreg wrapping technique. After the composite tubes were impacted at 2.5 J, 5.0 J, and 7.5 J, non-impacted and impacted composite tubes were tested under torsional loading. Contact force-deformation curves of impacted tubes are presented. Torsional moment-twist angle relations for both impacted and non-impacted composite tubes were obtained. In addition, front view and side view of the impacted zone of composite tubes are given. The results showed that sample [+/- 60](FW) had the best impact performance with regard to absorbed energy. The impacted samples of [+/- 60](FW) and [+/- 75](FW) had the lowest torsional strength for each energy level.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available