4.5 Article

Design of ethylene-propylene-diene monomer foam and its double-layer composite for improving sound absorption properties via experimental method and theoretical verification

Journal

POLYMER ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE
Volume 60, Issue 8, Pages 1877-1889

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pen.25424

Keywords

cell morphology; double-layer composite; EPDM foam; sound absorption

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51675324, 51903150]
  2. Talent Program of Shanghai University of Engineering Science
  3. Technical Service Platform for Vibration and Noise Testing and Control of New Energy Vehicles [18DZ2295900]
  4. Shanghai Sailing Program [18YF1409300]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, the ethylene-propylene-diene monomer (EPDM) foam was fabricated via 4-4 '-oxobisbenzenesulfonyl hydrazide (OBSH) and phenolic resin (PF) in an effort to prepare the sound-absorbing composite which has excellent sound absorption at the medium and low frequency. For single-layer EPDM foams, cell morphology showed a certain pattern, causing the peak of the sound absorption coefficient move to a higher frequency and the peak value reached a maximum of about 0.75 as the OBSH content increased. In addition, with the foaming temperature increasing, the cell morphology had a different tendency and the peak of the sound absorption coefficient moved first to the higher frequency and then to the lower frequency due to the vulcanization reaction. Compared with the single-layer EPDM foams, the sound absorption curve of the double-layer composite made of the single-layer EPDM foam and pure EPDM sheet with cavities moved to a lower frequency by about 400 Hz. The theoretical calculation method was used to verify the accuracy of the experimental results. This work provided a simple approach to control the sound absorption property of EPDM foamed material and its double-layer composite through from an experimental and theoretical perspective.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available