4.7 Article

Both the contribution of soil nitrogen and of biological N2 fixation to sugarcane can increase with the inoculation of diazotrophic bacteria

Journal

PLANT AND SOIL
Volume 454, Issue 1-2, Pages 155-169

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-020-04621-1

Keywords

N-15 natural abundance; Bacterial inoculant; Biological N(2)fixation; Sugarcane; Plant growth promotion

Funding

  1. Embrapa
  2. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) [INCT 465133/2014-2]
  3. Newton Fund [B/N012476/1]
  4. UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC)
  5. Brazilian National Council for State Funding Agencies (CONFAP)
  6. CAPES (Ministry of Education)
  7. program Cientista de Nosso Estado from the Carlos Chagas Rio State Research Foundation (FAPERJ)
  8. CNPq

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims This study was performed to determine if the contribution of biological N(2)fixation (BNF) associated with Brazilian sugarcane cultivars could be increased by the inoculation with N-2-fixing bacteria. Methods The field experiment was planted with two sugarcane cultivars, inoculated or not, with five N-2-fixing bacteria. All plant tissues, including belowground, were harvested for determination of dry matter, N accumulation and(15)N abundance at five occasions until 450 days after planting. Results Inoculation significantly increased total N accumulation in the aerial tissue of cultivar RB867515 from 147 to 199 kg N ha(-1)and cultivar RB92579 from 126 to 192 N kg ha(-1). At final harvest(15)N abundances of entire sugarcane plants compared to that of plant-available N indicated that BNF inputs were over 64%. Total N derived from BNF and the soil was increased by inoculation, by 50 and 17 kg N ha(-1)and 36 and 67 kg N ha(-1), for the two cultivars respectively. Conclusions Without inoculation, the two sugarcane cultivars obtained over 65% of N from BNF. Inoculation with the five component inoculant increased N accumulation from soil and BNF but with little impact on the proportion of N derived from BNF.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available