4.6 Article

Improvement of Bi doping in ZnO nanocrystals by co-doping with Al: crystal geometry calculations and photocatalytic activity

Journal

NANOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 50, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6528/aba92a

Keywords

ZnO; co-doping; photocatalysis; bandgap; crystal geometry

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work we demonstrate enhancement in visible-light photocatalytic activity (PCA) of ZnO nanoparticles (NPs) with minimal attenuation of visible light transmittance. This approach can benefit numerous optoelectronic and photocatalytic applications. ZnO NPs werep-nco-doped with Al and Bi to improve Bi doping into the ZnO crystal. Al- and/or Bi-doped ZnO was coprecipitated by ammonia from aqueous nitrate solutions of Zn2+, Al3+, and Bi3+, followed by microwave heating. Doping concentrations in Al- and Bi- doped ZnO (AZO and BZO) and Al/Bi co-doped ZnO (ABZO) were 1, 3, 5, and 7 mole %. The resulting NPs were characterized by XRD, TEM, EDS, BET, and UV-visible absorption. While EDS shows that almost all added Bi was incorporated into the ZnO, XRD analysis of BZO reveals formation of alpha-Bi(2)O(3)as a secondary phase due to the poor Bi solubility in ZnO. Co-doping of Al with Bi suppressed alpha-Bi(2)O(3)formation and increased Bi solubility in ZnO. XRD-based calculations of the lattice constants and deformation strain, stress, and energy all show insertion of Al and/or Bi into the crystal with different extents according to the dopants' solubilities into ZnO. AZO and BZO NPs hadE(g)lowered by 0.05-1.39 eV and 0.30-0.70 eV, respectively, relative to ZnO. On the other hand, ABZO hadE(g)reductions of only 0.01-0.20 eV due to formation of acceptor-donor complex through co-doping. ABZO gave higher PCA enhancements with respect toE(g)reductions (Delta k(photo)/-Delta E-g) than either AZO and BZO, with values up to 370, 126, and 13 min(-1)eV(-1), respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available