4.8 Article

Nanocytometer for smart analysis of peripheral blood and acute myeloid leukemia: a pilot study

Journal

NANO LETTERS
Volume 20, Issue 9, Pages 6572-6581

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c02300

Keywords

impedance cytometer; nanosensor; POC diagnostics; PBMCs; acute myeloid leukemia (AML); machine learning for data treatment

Funding

  1. Initiative and Networking Fund of the Helmholtz Association of German Research Centers through the International Helmholtz Research School for Nanoelectronic Networks, IHRS NANO NET [VH-KO-606]
  2. cluster of excellence cfaed [EXC 1056]
  3. DFG [BA 4986/7-1]
  4. European Union HORIZON 2020 research and innovation program under MSCA RISE 2016 project Carbo-Immap grant [734381]
  5. Eleonore Trefftz Program 2016
  6. Senior Dresden Fellowship Program 2017 in TU Dresden

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We realize an ultracompact nanocytometer for real-time impedimetric detection and classification of subpopulations of living cells. Nanoscopic nanowires in a microfluidic channel act as nanocapacitors and measure in real time the change of the amplitude and phase of the output voltage and, thus, the electrical properties of living cells. We perform the cell classification in the human peripheral blood (PBMC) and demonstrate for the first time the possibility to discriminate monocytes and subpopulations of lymphocytes in a label-free format. Further, we demonstrate that the PBMC of acute myeloid leukemia and healthy samples grant the label free identification of the disease. Using the algorithm based on machine learning, we generated specific data patterns to discriminate healthy donors and leukemia patients. Such a solution has the potential to improve the traditional diagnostics approaches with respect to the overall cost and time effort, in a label-free format, and restrictions of the complex data analysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available