4.7 Article

Validation of emission-line galaxies target selection algorithms for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument using the MMT Binospec

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 497, Issue 4, Pages 4587-4601

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa2270

Keywords

methods: observational; catalogues; cosmology: observations

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship [DGE -1745303]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy [DESC0013718]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of High Energy Physics [DE-SC002008]
  4. U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Science
  5. US National Science Foundation, Division of Astronomical Sciences
  6. Science and Technologies Facilities Council of the United Kingdom
  7. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  8. Heising-Simons Foundation
  9. French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission (CEA)
  10. National Council of Science and Technology of Mexico
  11. Ministry of Economy of Spain
  12. National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC), a U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science User Facility [DEAC02-05CH11231]
  13. Dark Energy Camera Legacy Survey (DECaLS
  14. NOAO) [2014B-0404]
  15. Beijing-Arizona Sky Survey (BASS
  16. NOAO) [2015A-0801]
  17. Mayall z-band Legacy Survey (MzLS
  18. NOAO) [2016A-0453]
  19. U.S. Department of Energy
  20. U.S. National Science Foundation
  21. Ministry of Science and Education of Spain
  22. Science and Technology Facilities Council of the United Kingdom
  23. Higher Education Funding Council for England
  24. National Center for Supercomputing Applications at the University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign
  25. Kavli Institute of Cosmological Physics at the University of Chicago
  26. Center for Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics at the Ohio State University
  27. Mitchell Institute for Fundamental Physics and Astronomy at Texas AM University
  28. Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos
  29. Fundacao Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
  30. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico
  31. Ministerio da Ciencia, Tecnologia e Inovacao
  32. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  33. Argonne National Laboratory
  34. University of California at Santa Cruz
  35. University of Cambridge
  36. Centro de Investigaciones Energeticas, Medioambientales y Tecnologicas-Madrid
  37. University of Chicago
  38. University College London
  39. DES-Brazil Consortium
  40. University of Edinburgh
  41. Eidgenossische Technische Hochschule (ETH) Zurich
  42. Fermi NationalAccelerator Laboratory
  43. University of Illinois atUrbanaChampaign
  44. Institut de Ciencies de l'Espai (IEEC/CSIC)
  45. Institut de Fisica d'Altes Energies
  46. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  47. Ludwig-Maximilians Universitat Munchen
  48. University of Michigan
  49. National Optical Astronomy Observatory
  50. University of Nottingham
  51. Ohio State University
  52. University of Pennsylvania
  53. University of Portsmouth
  54. SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
  55. Stanford University
  56. University of Sussex
  57. Texas AM University
  58. National Astronomical Observatories of China
  59. Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB09000000]
  60. Ministry of Finance
  61. External Cooperation Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [114A11KYSB20160057]
  62. Chinese National Natural Science Foundation [11433005]
  63. NationalAeronautics and Space Administration
  64. Office of Science, Office of High Energy Physics of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH1123]
  65. National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center, a DOE Office of Science User Facility [DE-AC02-05CH1123]
  66. U.S. National Science Foundation, Division of Astronomical Sciences [AST-0950945]
  67. Fundacao Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The forthcoming Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) experiment plans to measure the effects of dark energy on the expansion of the Universe and create a 3D map of the Universe using galaxies up to z similar to 1.6 and QSOs up to z similar to 3.5. In order to create this map, DESI will obtain spectroscopic redshifts of over 30 million objects; among them, a majority are [OII] emitting star-forming galaxies known as emission-line galaxies (ELGs). These ELG targets will be pre-selected by drawing a selection region on the g - r versus r - z colour-colour plot, where high-redshift ELGs form a separate locus from the lower redshift ELGs and interlopers. In this paper, we study the efficiency of three ELG target selection algorithms - the Final Design Report (FDR) cut based on the DEEP2 photometry, Number Density Modelling (NDM) and Random Forest - to determine how the combination of these three algorithms can be best used to yield a simple selection boundary that will be best suited to meet DESI's science goals. To do this, we selected 17 small patches in the DESI footprint where we run the three target selection algorithms to pre-select ELGs based on their photometry. We observed the pre-selected ELGs using the MMT Binospec, which is similar in functionality to the DESI instrument, to obtain their spectroscopic redshifts and fluxes of 1054 ELGs. By analysing the redshift and fluxing distribution of these galaxies, we find that although NDM performed the best, simple changes in the FDR definition would also yield sufficient performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available