4.7 Article

Lyman alpha absorption beyond the disc of simulated spiral galaxies

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 496, Issue 1, Pages 152-168

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa1490

Keywords

line: profiles; circumstellar matter; Galaxy: formation; quasars: absorption lines

Funding

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) within the German-South-African collaboration project [01DG15006]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany's Excellence Strategy from the DFG Cluster of Excellence 'ORIGINS' [EXC-2094 - 390783311]
  3. STFC [ST/R000972/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present an analysis of the origin and properties of the circumgalactic medium (CGM) in a suite of 11 cosmological zoom simulations resembling present-day spiral galaxies. On average the galaxies retain about 50 per cent of the cosmic fraction in baryons, almost equally divided into disc (interstellar medium) gas, cool CGM gas and warm-hot CGM gas. At radii smaller than 50 kpc the CGM is dominated by recycled warm-hot gas injected from the central galaxy, while at larger radii it is dominated by cool gas accreted on to the halo. The recycled gas typically accounts for one-third of the CGM mass. We introduce the novel publicly available analysis tool PYGAD to compute ion abundances and mock absorption spectra. For Lyman alpha absorption, we find good agreement of the simulated equivalent width (EW) distribution and observations out to large radii. Disc galaxies with quiescent assembly histories show significantly more absorption along the disc major axis. By comparing the EW and HI column densities, we find that CGM Lyman alpha absorbers are best represented by an effective line width b approximate to 50-70 km s(-1) that increases mildly with halo mass, larger than typically assumed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available