4.8 Article

Excess tau PET ligand retention in elderly patients with major depressive disorder

Journal

MOLECULAR PSYCHIATRY
Volume 26, Issue 10, Pages 5856-5863

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41380-020-0766-9

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. AMED [JP17dm0107094]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that tau protein accumulations in the brains of MDD patients were significantly higher than healthy controls, especially in patients with psychotic symptoms. These findings suggest that tau depositions may underlie MDD, particularly in those with psychotic symptoms.
Depression is one of the common psychiatric disorders in old age. Major depressive disorder (MDD) has been identified as a risk factor or prodrome for neurodegenerative dementias, suggesting neuropathological overlaps and a continuum between MDD and neurodegenerative disorders. In this study, we examined tau and amyloid-beta (A beta) accumulations in the brains of MDD and healthy controls using positron emission tomography (PET) to explore pathological substrates of this illness. Twenty MDD and twenty age-matched, healthy controls were examined by PET with a tau radioligand, [C-11]PBB3, and an A beta radioligand, [C-11]PiB. Radioligand retentions were quantified as a standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR). We also assessed clinical manifestations of the patients using the 17-item Hamilton Depression Scale, the Geriatric Depression Scale, and psychotic symptoms. Mean cortical [C-11]PBB3 SUVRs in MDD patients were significantly higher than those of healthy controls. These values were higher in MDD patients with psychotic symptoms than in those without any. The present findings indicate that tau depositions may underlie MDD, and especially in patients with psychotic symptoms. PET detection of tau accumulations may provide mechanistic insights into neuronal dysfunctions in these cases and could serve as predictions of their clinical consequences.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available