4.6 Article

Expression of the Androgen Receptor Governs Radiation Resistance in a Subset of Glioblastomas Vulnerable to Antiandrogen Therapy

Journal

MOLECULAR CANCER THERAPEUTICS
Volume 19, Issue 10, Pages 2163-2174

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-20-0095

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Innocrin Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  2. Jones Family Foundation Fund within the Chad Carr Pediatric Brain Tumor Center
  3. University of Michigan Cancer Center Core grant [P30CA046592]
  4. American Cancer Society
  5. Forbes Institute for Cancer Discovery
  6. NCI [K08CA234416]
  7. Postdoctoral Translational Scholar Program from the Michigan Institute for Clinical & Health Research of University of Michigan [UL1TR002240]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

New approaches are needed to overcome intrinsic therapy resistance in glioblastoma (GBM). Because GBMs exhibit sexual dimorphism and are reported to express steroid hormone receptors, we reasoned that signaling through the androgen receptor (AR) could mediate therapy resistance in GBM, much as it does in AR-positive prostate and breast cancers. We found that nearly half of GBM cell lines, patient-derived xenografts (PDX), and human tumors expressed AR at the transcript and protein level-with expression levels overlapping those of primary prostate cancer. Analysis of gene expression datasets also revealed that AR expression is higher in GBM patient samples than normal brain tissue. Multiple clinical-grade anti-androgens slowed the growth of and radiosensitized AR-positive GBM cell lines and PDXs in vitro and in vivo. Anti-androgens blocked the ability of AR-positive GBM PDXs to engage adaptive transcriptional programs following radiation and slowed the repair of radiation-induced DNA damage. These results suggest that combining blood-brain barrier permeable antiandrogens with radiation may have promise for patients with AR-positive GBMs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available