4.5 Article

Effect of Betaine Supplementation on Liver Tissue and Ultrastructural Changes in Methionine-Choline-Deficient Diet-Induced NAFLD

Journal

MICROSCOPY AND MICROANALYSIS
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages 997-1006

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1431927620024265

Keywords

autophagosomes; betaine; mitochondria; nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; ultrastructure

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia [175015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) represents a hepatic manifestation of metabolic syndrome. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of betaine on ultrastructural changes in the mouse liver with methionine- and choline-deficient (MCD) diet-induced NAFLD. Male C57BL/6 mice were divided into groups: Control-fed with standard chow, BET-standard chow supplemented with betaine (1.5% w/v drinking water), MCD-fed with MCD diet, and MCD + BET-MCD diet with betaine supplementation for 6 weeks. Liver samples were taken for pathohistology and transmission electron microscopy. The MCD diet-induced steatosis, inflammation, and balloon-altered hepatocytes were alleviated by betaine. MCD diet induced an increase in mitochondrial size versus the control group (p< 0.01), which was decreased in the betaine-treated group. In the MCD diet-fed group, the total mitochondrial count decreased versus the control group (p< 0.01), while it increased in the MCD + BET group versus MCD (p< 0.01). Electron microscopy showed an increase in the number of autophagosomes in the MCD and MCD + BET group versus control, and a significant difference in autophagosomes number was detected in the MCD + BET group by comparison with the MCD diet-treated group (p< 0.05). Betaine decreases the number of enlarged mitochondria, alleviates steatosis, and increases the number of autophagosomes in the liver of mice with NAFLD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available