4.7 Article

Adsorptive properties in toluene removal over hierarchical zeolites

Journal

MICROPOROUS AND MESOPOROUS MATERIALS
Volume 302, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2020.110204

Keywords

Adsorptive properties; Toluene removal; Hierarchical zeolites

Funding

  1. National Key R&D program of China [2017YFE0127400]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province [2019CFA070]
  3. Opening Project of Hubei Key Laboratory of Processing and Application of Catalytic Materials [201829103]
  4. Program for Huazhong University of Science and Technology (HUST) Academic Frontier Youth Team [2018QYTD03]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Three kinds of hierarchical Mordenite Framework Inverted (MFI)-type nanozeolites including Si-MFI, Al-MFI and Ti-MFI were successfully synthesized by two-stage varying temperature hydrothermal treatment. Taking toluene as the probe molecule, a series of methods were used to evaluate the adsorption properties of as-synthesized hierarchical zeolites samples including the adsorption breakthrough curves, simulation of adsorption isotherms as well as kinetics models and toluene-TPD (the temperature programmed desorption of toluene). The dynamic adsorption results showed that Al-MFI exhibited the highest adsorption capacity for toluene (58 mg/ g(ads) ) under dry gas condition while Ti-MFI had the optimal toluene adsorption performance (45 mg/g(ads) ) under the wet gas condition (the relative humidity was 50%). The simulation results indicated that the adsorption behavior of toluene on hierarchical MFI nanozeolites conformed to the Freundlich principle, and the pseudo-first-order adsorption model was suitable to elucidate the adsorption process. Moreover, the fitting result of intraparticle diffusion model indicated that the adsorption process was affected by multiple adsorption steps and the intraparticle diffusion was not the control step.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available