4.4 Article

Exfoliation and intergranular corrosion resistance of the 2198 Al-Cu-Li alloy with different thermomechanical treatments

Journal

MATERIALS AND CORROSION-WERKSTOFFE UND KORROSION
Volume 71, Issue 12, Pages 1957-1970

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/maco.202011839

Keywords

Al-Cu-Li alloys; exfoliation corrosion; intergranular corrosion; thermomechanical treatments; transgranular corrosion

Funding

  1. FAPESP [2013/13235-6, 2019/18388-1]
  2. CNPq [2017-9/169569]
  3. CAPES [88882.333479/2019-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the resistance to exfoliation and intergranular corrosion (IGC) of the 2198 Al-Cu-Li alloy submitted to different thermomechanical treatments (T3, T8, and T851) was investigated. The tests were carried out following the standard practices, ASTM G34-18 and ASTM G110-15, respectively. All the tested alloys showed susceptibility to exfoliation and some alloys showed susceptibility to IGC, but the artificially aged alloys presented a higher tendency to exfoliation. The extensive hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) was observed on the surfaces of artificially aged alloys when immersed in the EXCO solution. The HER resulted in an increase in solution pH with the time of immersion. Also, the weight losses related to the artificially aged alloys were higher than that of the naturally aged ones. The T8 treatment was the only condition that resulted in susceptibility to both, intergranular and transgranular corrosion, whereas the T851 treatment did not show IGC susceptibility, only transgranular corrosion. Finally, the 2198-T3 condition showed the highest corrosion resistance among the thermomechanical treatments tested. The results of the 2198 alloy subjected to various treatments were compared with that of the 2024-T3 alloy. This last alloy showed higher resistance to exfoliation and IGC as compared with the 2198 alloy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available