4.7 Article

Investigation of dynamic properties of a long-span cable-stayed bridge during typhoon events based on structural health monitoring

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104172

Keywords

Long-span bridge; Vibration responses; Modal parameters; Typhoon; Structural health monitoring

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51722804, 51978155]
  2. Jiangsu Provincial Key Research and Development Program [BE2018120]
  3. National Ten Thousand Talent Program for Young Top-Notch Talents [W03070080]
  4. State Key Laboratory on Safety and Health of In-Service Long-span Bridges of JSTI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Three typhoons approached the southeast coast of China during August 2012. The structural health monitoring (SHM) system recorded in-situ environmental factors (including wind speed and temperature) and structural responses (including displacements and acceleration) during the whole period. Based on the recorded SHM data, the variation features of the environmental factors and structural responses are investigated respectively. Furthermore, modal parameters including natural frequencies and damping ratios of SCB are identified and tracked during this period; such that, the relationship between modal parameters and environmental factors is studied. Results show that the variation of acceleration amplitude of the deck is mainly caused by the high-frequency excitations between 1.0 and 7.0 Hz which may correspond to the traffic and high-frequency wind loads. The low-frequency wind load, smaller than 1.0 Hz, is the major factor that controls the variation of dynamic displacements of the deck. In addition, a clear relationship between damping ratios and wind speed can be observed for the first three vertical modes, based on which, the aerodynamic damping can be subtracted. Conclusions can provide references for serviceability and safety assessment of similar long-span bridges.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available