4.4 Article

Quantifying deformation processes in the SE Pyrenees using U-Pb dating of fracture-filling calcites

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY
Volume 177, Issue 6, Pages 1186-1196

Publisher

GEOLOGICAL SOC PUBL HOUSE
DOI: 10.1144/jgs2020-014

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. DGICYT Spanish Project Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovacion y Universidades/Agencia Estatal de Investigacion/Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional, Union Europea [PGC2018-093903-B-C22]
  2. Grups Consolidats de Recerca `Geologia Sedimentaria' [2017SGR-824]
  3. Grups Consolidats de Recerca 'Modelitzacio Geodinamica de la Litosfera' [2017SGR-847]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is difficult to quantify the timing of the deformation processes in brittle fold-thrust belts because minerals suitable for dating and well-preserved growth strata sediments are scarce or absent. Here, we quantify the duration of thrust sheet emplacement and shortening rates in the SE Pyrenean thrust sequence using U-Pb dating of fracture-filling calcites. The obtained U-Pb dates reveal a minimum duration for the emplacement of each thrust unit (18.7Ma for the Boixols-Upper Pedraforca, 11.6Ma for the Lower Pedraforca and 14.3Ma for the Cadi thrust sheets) and show that piggy-back thrusting was accompanied by post-emplacement deformation of the upper thrust sheets above the lower sheets during their south-directed tectonic transport. We calculated shortening rates of 0.6, 3.1 and 1.1mma(-1) from the older to younger emplaced thrust sheets. Our results also reveal the formation of local normal faults during the late Oligocene as a result of the late stages of compression and exhumation in the SE Pyrenees. We observed that temperatures >110 degrees C could be a limiting factor when applying the U-Pb dating method.Supplementary material: U-Pb analytical results, concordia plots and fracture data are available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5078862

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available