4.4 Review

Isoflavone combined with exercise on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
Volume 83, Issue 7, Pages 678-685

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000365

Keywords

Bone density; Isoflavones; Postmenopause

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: This meta-analysis of randomized control trials (RCTs) aimed to evaluate the effects of isoflavones supplementation combined with exercise training on bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal women. Methods: Two reviewers did a complete search of two electronic database (Medline, PubMed) records up to January 31, 2019. Risk of bias was classified based on the Cochrane Collaboration tool. The pooled standard mean difference (SMD) combined with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used as the effect size of BMD values. Results: A total of four RCTs with 609 participants were included for meta-analysis. The BMD did not differ significantly between isoflavone supplementation combined with exercise training group and placebo group (sub-whole body: SMD = 0.00, 95% CI, -0.23 to 0.24; lumbar spine: SMD = 0.15, 95% CI, -0.30 to 0.60; total hip: SMD = 0.05, 95% CI, -0.18 to 0.298; femoral neck: SMD = 0.10, 95% CI, -0.23 to 0.43; trochanter: SMD = 0.09, 95% CI, -0.14 to 0.33; ward's triangle: SMD = -0.03, 95% CI, -0.24 to 0.30). In addition, combined intervention did not provide additive effects on BMD improvements compared with exercise or isoflavone supplementation alone. The trials included in this meta-analysis were small and some had methodological limitations. Conclusion: The present meta-analysis reveals that isoflavone supplements combined with exercise training do not significantly increase BMD in postmenopausal women. In addition, combined intervention does not provide additive effects on BMD improvements compared with exercise or isoflavone supplementation alone.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available