4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Rapid N-Glycan Profiling of Serum and Plasma by a Novel Slide-Based Imaging Mass Spectrometry Workflow

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR MASS SPECTROMETRY
Volume 31, Issue 12, Pages 2511-2520

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jasms.0c00213

Keywords

N-glycan; glycosylation; serum; plasma; imaging mass spectrometry; MALDI

Funding

  1. Department of Defense [PC160851, U54 MD010706, U01 CA226052, R21 CA225474]
  2. NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) [TL1 TR001451, UL1 TR001450]
  3. [U01 CA242096]
  4. [R01 CA212409]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Changes in the levels and compositions of N-glycans released from serum and plasma glycoproteins have been assessed in many diseases across many large clinical sample cohorts. Assays used for N-glycan profiling in these fluids currently require multiple processing steps and have limited throughput, thus diminishing their potential for use as standard clinical diagnostic assays. A novel slide-based N-glycan profiling method was evaluated for sensitivity and reproducibility using a pooled serum standard. Serum was spotted on to an amine-reactive slide, delipidated and desalted with a series of washes, sprayed with peptide N-glycosidase F and matrix, and analyzed by MALDI-FTICR or MALDI-Q-TOF mass spectrometry. Routinely, over 75 N-glycan species can be detected from one microliter of serum in less than 6.5 h. Additionally, endoglycosidase F3 was applied to this workflow to identify core-fucosylated N-glycans and displayed the adaptability of this method for the determination of structural information. This method was applied to a small pooled serum set from either obese or nonobese patients that had breast cancer or a benign lesion. This study confirms the reproducibility, sensitivity, and adaptability of a novel method for N-glycan profiling of serum and plasma for potential application to clinical diagnostics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available