4.6 Article

Effects of rock phosphate added with farm yard manure or sugar juice residues on wheat growth and uptake of certain nutrients and heavy metals

Journal

JOURNAL OF SOILS AND SEDIMENTS
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages 3931-3940

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11368-020-02683-3

Keywords

Grain yield; Heavy metals toxicity; Phosphorus fertilization; Plant residues; Remediation; Sugar industry by-products

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Development Fund (STDF), Cairo, Egypt [STDF 2153]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose Rock phosphate (RP) and farm yard manure (FYM) can promote plant growth, but little is known about the effect of sugar juice residues (FMC) on Zn, Cu, Cd, and Pb phyto-availability. This study investigated the effects of FYM and FMC added alone or each in combination with RP on wheat growth and Zn, Cu, Cd, and Pb uptake. Methods Wheat was grown in a soil amended with 0.25, 0.5, or 0.75 g RP or with 5, 10, or 20 g kg(-1)soil of FYM, or FMC, added separately, or each in combination with 0.75 g P2O5-RP kg(-1)soil. At harvest, shoot N, P, and K; soil pH; available P and DTPA-Zn, Cu, Pb, and Cd, dry matters of root, shoot, and grain; and heavy metals' concentration in each organ were determined. Results RP addition increased growth and P and K uptake and reduced Zn, Cu, Cd, and Pb of wheat more at the high application rate compared to the low application rate. Compared to the control, FYM addition decreased soil pH, increased P and metals availability and uptake, and decreased plant biomass, whereas FMC addition increased soil pH, decreased P and metals availability and uptake, and increased plant biomass; these effects were maximized with increasing the application rate. Conclusion The results revealed that FMC has the potential in limiting heavy metal uptake and that the combined application of FMC and RP is beneficial for wheat growth.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available