4.4 Article

Incorporation and Remodeling of Bone Block Allografts in the Maxillary Reconstruction: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Journal

CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages 180-194

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cid.12441

Keywords

alveolar ridge reconstruction; bone allograft; bone augmentation; bone grafting; edentulous atrophic maxilla; implant survival; randomized controlled trial; histological analysis

Funding

  1. Brazilian funding agency Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundSevere alveolar atrophy often presents a challenge for the implant surgery. The significant lack of bone in the alveolar ridges may compromise the final restorations both from the aesthetic and functional standpoints. ObjectivesTo evaluate the behavior of bone block allografts for the maxillary augmentation and to investigate its incorporation, remodeling, and implant survival rates in two different healing time points. Material and MethodsSixty-six consecutive patients (52 female/14 male, mean age: 57.959.06 years old), presenting 113 atrophic alveolar ridges underwent maxillary augmentation with fresh-frozen allogeneic bone blocks from tibia. Patients were randomly assigned in two groups: Group 1patients who would wait 4 months for implant placement after grafting, and Group 2patients who would wait 6 months. Events of infection, suture dehiscence or mucosal perforation were recorded. Cone-beam computed tomography scans were compared volumetrically between the time of the grafting surgery and reentry procedure after incorporation. Biopsies were collected and subjected to histological, histomorphometric and immunehistochemical analysis. ResultsA total of 305 implants were placed in the reconstructed sites. The mean resorption rate in Group 1 (13.98%+/- 5.59) was significantly lower than Group 2 (31.52%+/- 6.31). The amount of calcified tissue, newly formed bone and remaining graft particles demonstrated no difference between groups. The samples showed evident immunolabeling for the podoplanin protein in both groups. The implants cumulative survival rate was 94.76%. ConclusionsThe findings of the present study indicate that there is a significant difference regarding the resorption of the grafts when waiting 4 or 6 months before placing the implants, even though no difference was found in the histological, histomorphometric, and immunohistochemical features. Both 4-month and 6-months healing times are suitable for the implant placement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available