4.8 Article

Auger Recombination Lifetime Scaling for Type I and Quasi-Type II Core/Shell Quantum Dots

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
Volume 11, Issue 13, Pages 5132-5138

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c01460

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Department of Energy, Photonics at Thermodynamic Limits Energy Frontier Research Center [DE-SC0019140]
  2. University of California Lab Fee Research Program [LFR-17-477237]
  3. National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC)
  4. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science User Facility [DE-AC02-05CH11231]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Having already achieved near-unity quantum yields, with promising properties for light-emitting diode, lasing, and charge separation applications, colloidal core/shell quantum dots have great technological potential. The shell thickness and band alignment of the shell and core materials are known to influence the efficiency of these devices. In many such applications, improving the efficiency requires a deep understanding of multiexcitonic states. Herein, we elucidate the shell thickness and band alignment dependencies of the biexciton Auger recombination lifetime for quasi-type II CdSe/CdS and type I CdSe/ZnS core/shell quantum dots. We find that the biexciton Auger recombination lifetime increases with the total nanocrystal volume for quasi-type II CdSe/CdS core/shell quantum dots and is independent of the shell thickness for type I CdSe/ZnS core/shell quantum dots. To perform these calculations and compute Auger recombination lifetimes, we developed a low-scaling approach based on the stochastic resolution of identity. The numerical approach provided a framework for studying the scaling of the biexciton Auger recombination lifetimes in terms of the shell thickness dependencies of the exciton radii, Coulomb couplings, and density of final states in quasi-type II CdSe/CdS and type I CdSe/ZnS core/shell quantum dots.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available