Does the use of open, non-anonymous peer review in scholarly publishing introduce bias? Evidence from the F1000Research post-publication open peer review publishing model

The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals

(2019) Giangiacomo Bravo et al.   Nature Communications

Are gender gaps due to evaluations of the applicant or the science? A natural experiment at a national funding agency

(2019) Holly O Witteman et al.   LANCET

Assessment of potential bias in research grant peer review in Canada

(2018) Robyn Tamblyn et al.   CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL

Promote scientific integrity via journal peer review data

(2017) Carole J. Lee et al.   SCIENCE

National scientific performance evolution patterns: Retrenchment, successful expansion, or overextension

(2017) Mike Thelwall et al.   Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology

Survey on open peer review: Attitudes and experience amongst editors, authors and reviewers

(2017) Tony Ross-Hellauer et al.   PLoS One

Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production

(2016) Vincent Larivière et al.   SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE

The Peer Reviewers' Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review

(2016) Richard D. Morey et al.   Royal Society Open Science

Editor and reviewer gender influence the peer review process but not peer review outcomes at an ecology journal

(2015) Charles W. Fox et al.   FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY

Does a research article's country of origin affect perception of its quality and relevance? A national trial of US public health researchers

(2015) M Harris et al.   BMJ Open

The Scientific Impact of Nations: Journal Placement and Citation Performance

(2014) Matthew J. Smith et al.   PLoS One

Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping

(2014) Kyle Siler et al.   PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

"Undemocracy": inequalities in science

(2014) Y. Xie   SCIENCE

Open, single-blind, double-blind: which peer review process do you prefer?

(2014) Elizabeth C Moylan et al.   BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology

Journal acceptance rates: A cross-disciplinary analysis of variability and relationships with journal measures

(2013) Cassidy R. Sugimoto et al.   Journal of Informetrics

Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers

(2012) Adrian Mulligan et al.   JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science

(2011) S. J. Ceci et al.   PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA