4.5 Article

Hepatectomy for Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Resection Margin Width Does Not Predict Survival

Journal

JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY
Volume 25, Issue 7, Pages 1727-1735

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11605-020-04765-6

Keywords

Hepatocellular carcinoma; Hepatectomy; Margin; Survival

Funding

  1. Harvard Catalyst | The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center (National Center for Research Resources, National Institutes of Health) [UL1 TR001102]
  2. Harvard Catalyst | The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center (National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health Award) [UL1 TR001102]
  3. Harvard University
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81201948]
  5. China Scholarship Council Foundation [201203170045]
  6. Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing [cstc2012jjA0337]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that in patients with solitary hepatocellular carcinoma, different hepatic resection margin widths did not have a significant impact on overall survival, recurrence-free survival, and liver-specific recurrence-free survival.
Background The survival benefit of negative margins for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been demonstrated. However, there is no consensus regarding the optimal resection margin width. We assessed the impact of hepatic resection margin width for solitary HCC on overall (OS), recurrence-free (RFS), and liver-specific recurrence-free survival (LSRFS). Methods Clinicopathologic data were retrospectively collected for solitary HCC patients who underwent a negative margin hepatectomy (1992-2015). Margin width was categorized in tertiles as narrow (<= 0.3 cm), intermediate (0.31-1.0 cm), or wide (> 1.0 cm). Survival was compared among groups. Results Of the 178 included patients, most were male (76%); median age, MELD score, and tumor size were 63 years, 8, and 5.2 cm, respectively; 93% were Child-Pugh class A. Median margin width was 0.5 cm. Median follow-up and OS were 47.8 months and 76.7 months, respectively. There was no significant survival difference among narrow, intermediate, and wide margin groups with a median OS of 53 months (IQR 21-not reached [NR]), 74 months (IQR 14-138), and 97 months (IQR 37-142) (p = 0.87), respectively. Median RFS was 33.0 months; again, there was no difference among narrow, intermediate, and wide margin groups with a median of 31 months (IQR 18-NR), 45 months (IQR 14-NR), and 27 months (IQR 11-NR), respectively (p = 0.66). Median LSRFS was 63.0 months (IQR 14-NR) with no difference among groups (p = 0.87). In multivariate analyses, margin width was not associated with OS (p = 0.77), RFS (p = 0.74), or LSRFS (p = 0.92). Findings were similar in all subgroups analyzed (<= 5 cm, > 5 cm, microvascular invasion, T1, T2/T3, anatomical or non-anatomical resection, major or minor hepatectomy). Conclusions Narrow margins appear to be oncologically safe and the feasibility of achieving wide margins should not determine resectability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available