The inverse-probability-of-censoring weighting (IPCW) adjusted win ratio statistic: an unbiased estimator in the presence of independent censoring
Published 2020 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
The inverse-probability-of-censoring weighting (IPCW) adjusted win ratio statistic: an unbiased estimator in the presence of independent censoring
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
Volume 30, Issue 5, Pages 882-899
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Online
2020-06-18
DOI
10.1080/10543406.2020.1757692
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- On the empirical choice of the time window for restricted mean survival time
- (2020) Lu Tian et al. BIOMETRICS
- Evaluation of inferential methods for the net benefit and win ratio statistics
- (2020) Johan Verbeeck et al. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
- The win ratio: On interpretation and handling of ties
- (2019) Gaohong Dong et al. Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research
- Prioritized concordance index for hierarchical survival outcomes
- (2019) Li C. Cheung et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Statistical Appraisal of 6 Recent Clinical Trials in Cardiology
- (2019) Stuart J. Pocock et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
- Inverse probability weighting methods for Cox regression with right‐truncated data
- (2019) Bella Vakulenko‐Lagun et al. BIOMETRICS
- The win ratio: Impact of censoring and follow‐up time and use with nonproportional hazards
- (2019) Gaohong Dong et al. PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS
- Generalized pairwise comparison methods to analyze (non)prioritized composite endpoints
- (2019) J. Verbeeck et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- On the alternative hypotheses for the win ratio
- (2018) Lu Mao BIOMETRICS
- Graphing the Win Ratio and its components over time
- (2018) Dianne M. Finkelstein et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- The stratified win ratio
- (2017) Gaohong Dong et al. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
- Estimation of the cumulative incidence function under multiple dependent and independent censoring mechanisms
- (2017) Judith J. Lok et al. LIFETIME DATA ANALYSIS
- Comparison of the restricted mean survival time with the hazard ratio in superiority trials with a time-to-event end point
- (2017) Bo Huang et al. PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS
- Weighted win loss approach for analyzing prioritized outcomes
- (2017) Xiaodong Luo et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- On the win-ratio statistic in clinical trials with multiple types of event
- (2016) D. Oakes BIOMETRIKA
- A win ratio approach to comparing continuous non-normal outcomes in clinical trials
- (2016) Duolao Wang et al. PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS
- A generalized analytic solution to the win ratio to analyze a composite endpoint considering the clinical importance order among components
- (2016) Gaohong Dong et al. PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS
- An extension of generalized pairwise comparisons for prioritized outcomes in the presence of censoring
- (2016) Julien Péron et al. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH
- The Net Chance of a Longer Survival as a Patient-Oriented Measure of Treatment Benefit in Randomized Clinical Trials
- (2016) Julien Péron et al. JAMA Oncology
- Large sample inference for a win ratio analysis of a composite outcome based on prioritized components: Table 1.
- (2015) Ionut Bebu et al. BIOSTATISTICS
- An alternative approach to confidence interval estimation for the win ratio statistic
- (2014) Xiaodong Luo et al. BIOMETRICS
- Predicting the restricted mean event time with the subject's baseline covariates in survival analysis
- (2013) L. Tian et al. BIOSTATISTICS
- Limitation of Inverse Probability-of-Censoring Weights in Estimating Survival in the Presence of Strong Selection Bias
- (2011) Chanelle J. Howe et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- The win ratio: a new approach to the analysis of composite endpoints in clinical trials based on clinical priorities
- (2011) S. J. Pocock et al. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
- Generalized pairwise comparisons of prioritized outcomes in the two-sample problem
- (2010) Marc Buyse STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started