4.1 Article

Effective grain orientation mapping of complex and locally anisotropic media for improved imaging in ultrasonic non-destructive testing

Journal

INVERSE PROBLEMS IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
Volume 28, Issue 12, Pages 1694-1718

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17415977.2020.1762596

Keywords

Imaging; wave propagation; nondestructive evaluation; ultrasonics; Bayesian inverse problems; M; Slodicka

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/S001174/1, EP/P005268/1]
  2. EDF
  3. Rolls Royce
  4. National Nuclear Laboratory
  5. National Physical Laboratory
  6. Onscale
  7. EPSRC [EP/S001174/1, EP/P005268/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Imaging defects in austenitic welds presents a significant challenge for the ultrasonic non-destructive testing community. Due to the heating process during their manufacture, a dendritic structure develops, exhibiting large grains with locally anisotropic properties which cause the ultrasonic waves to scatter and refract. When basic imaging algorithms, which typically make constant wave speed assumptions, are applied to datasets arising from the inspection of these welds, the resulting defect reconstructions are often distorted and difficult to interpret correctly. However, knowledge of the underlying spatially varying material properties allows correction of the expected wave travel times and thus results in more reliable defect reconstructions. In this paper, an approximation to the underlying, locally anisotropic structure of the weld is constructed from ultrasonic time of flight data. A new forward model of wave front propagation in locally anisotropic media is presented and used within the reversible-jump Markov chain Monte Carlo method to invert for the map of effective grain orientations across different regions of the weld. This forward model and estimated map are then used as the basis for an advanced imaging algorithm and the resulting defect reconstructions exhibit a significant improvement across multiple flaw characterization metrics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available