Risk stratification in breast cancer screening: Cost‐effectiveness and harm‐benefit ratios for low‐risk and high‐risk women
Published 2020 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Risk stratification in breast cancer screening: Cost‐effectiveness and harm‐benefit ratios for low‐risk and high‐risk women
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2020-06-02
DOI
10.1002/ijc.33126
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Cost-effectiveness and Benefit-to-Harm Ratio of Risk-Stratified Screening for Breast Cancer
- (2018) Nora Pashayan et al. JAMA Oncology
- Cohort Profile: The Karolinska Mammography Project for Risk Prediction of Breast Cancer (KARMA)
- (2017) Marike Gabrielson et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Evaluation of a Stratified National Breast Screening Program in the United Kingdom: An Early Model-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
- (2017) Ewan Gray et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Epidemiologic evidence of slow growing, nonprogressive or regressive breast cancer: A systematic review
- (2016) Nereo Segnan et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Cross-national comparison of screening mammography accuracy measures in U.S., Norway, and Spain
- (2015) Laia Domingo et al. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
- Cost-effectiveness of digital mammography screening before the age of 50 in The Netherlands
- (2015) Valérie D.V. Sankatsing et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Breast Density and Benign Breast Disease: Risk Assessment to Identify Women at High Risk of Breast Cancer
- (2015) Jeffrey A. Tice et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- Prevalence of Mammographically Dense Breasts in the United States
- (2014) Brian L. Sprague et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Cost-Effectiveness and Harm-Benefit Analyses of Risk-Based Screening Strategies for Breast Cancer
- (2014) Ester Vilaprinyo et al. PLoS One
- Using Clinical Factors and Mammographic Breast Density to Estimate Breast Cancer Risk: Development and Validation of a New Predictive Model
- (2013) Jeffrey A. Tice et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Personalizing Mammography by Breast Density and Other Risk Factors for Breast Cancer: Analysis of Health Benefits and Cost-Effectiveness
- (2013) John T. Schousboe et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Tipping the Balance of Benefits and Harms to Favor Screening Mammography Starting at Age 40 Years
- (2013) Nicolien T. van Ravesteyn ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Risk Factors for Breast Cancer for Women Aged 40 to 49 Years
- (2013) Heidi D. Nelson ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Nation-wide data on screening performance during the transition to digital mammography: Observations in 6 million screens
- (2013) Paula A. van Luijt et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Cost-Effectiveness of Screening Women With Familial Risk for Breast Cancer With Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- (2013) Sepideh Saadatmand et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Mammographic Screening Programmes in Europe: Organization, Coverage and Participation
- (2012) Livia Giordano et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING
- Cost-effectiveness Analysis of a Quantitative Immunochemical Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening
- (2011) Janneke A. Wilschut et al. GASTROENTEROLOGY
- The impact of digital mammography on screening a young cohort of women for breast cancer in an urban specialist breast unit
- (2010) Nicholas M. Perry et al. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started