4.4 Article

Impact of COVID-19 on liver function: results from an internal medicine unit in Northern Italy

Journal

INTERNAL AND EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages 1399-1407

Publisher

SPRINGER-VERLAG ITALIA SRL
DOI: 10.1007/s11739-020-02425-w

Keywords

Acute respiratory failure; Coronavirus; Hepatitis; Severe acute respiratory syndrome

Funding

  1. UniversitA degli Studi di Pavia within the CRUI-CARE Agreement
  2. University of Pavia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Little is known regarding coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) clinical spectrum in non-Asian populations. We herein describe the impact of COVID-19 on liver function in 100 COVID-19 consecutive patients (median age 70 years, range 25-97; 79 males) who were admitted to our internal medicine unit in March 2020. We retrospectively assessed liver function tests, taking into account demographic characteristics and clinical outcome. A patient was considered as having liver injury when alanine aminotransferase (ALT) was > 50 mU/ml, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) > 50 mU/ml, or total bilirubin > 1.1 mg/dl. Spearman correlation coefficient for laboratory data and bivariable analysis for mortality and/or need for intensive care were assessed. A minority of patients (18.6%) were obese, and most patients were non- or moderate-drinkers (88.5%). Liver function tests were altered in 62.4% of patients, and improved during follow-up. None of the seven patients with known chronic liver disease had liver decompensation. Only one patient developed acute liver failure. In patients with altered liver function tests, PaO2/FiO(2) < 200 was associated with greater mortality and need for intensive care (HR 2.34, 95% CI 1.07-5.11,p = 0.033). To conclude, a high prevalence of altered liver function tests was noticed in Italian patients with COVID-19, and this was associated with worse outcomes when developing severe acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available