4.7 Article

Improved Deep Mixture Density Network for Regional Wind Power Probabilistic Forecasting

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages 2549-2560

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2020.2971607

Keywords

Wind power forecasting; mixture density network; deep learning; multiple wind farms; regional wind power forecasting

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1765201, U1765104]
  2. Open Fund of Operation and Control of Renewable Energy & Storage Systems (China Electric Power Research Institute) [181000895]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Unsteady motion of the atmosphere incurs nonlinear and spatiotemporally coupled uncertainties in the wind power prediction (WPP) of multiple wind farms. This brings both opportunities and challenges to wind power probabilistic forecasting (WPPF) of a wind farm cluster or region, particularly when wind power is highly penetrated within the power system. This paper proposes an Improved Deep Mixture Density Network (IDMDN) for short-term WPPF of multiple wind farms and the entire region. In this respect, a deep multi-to-multi (m2m) mapping Neural Network model, which adopts the beta kernel as the mixture component to avoid the density leakage problem, is established to produce probabilistic forecasts in an end-to-end manner. A novel modified activation function and several general training procedures are then introduced to overcome the unstable behavior and NaN (Not a Number) loss issues of the beta kernel function. Verification of IDMDN is based on an open-source dataset collected from seven wind farms, and comparison results show that the proposed model improves the WPPF performance at both wind farm and regional levels. Furthermore, a laconic and accurate probabilistic expression of predicted power at each time step is produced by the proposed model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available