4.3 Article

Dehydration as a Possible Cause of Monthly Variation in the Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism

Journal

CLINICAL AND APPLIED THROMBOSIS-HEMOSTASIS
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages 569-574

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1076029616649435

Keywords

DVT; PE; VTE; dehydration; month; season

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Monthly or seasonal changes in the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) were previously reported; however, the mechanism of such variability is not completely understood. Methods: In the present retrospective single-center analysis, consecutive patients with proximal deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism (PE) diagnosed between January 2009 and December 2013 were evaluated. Results: The study population included 1496 patients, 48% men, mean age 63 18 years. Most (82%) cases with VTE were provoked and 39% of patients had active cancer. Four months of peak incidence (3, 7, 10 and 11) were compared with 4 months of the lowest incidence (4, 5, 6, and 12), showing a significant difference in VTE numbers (597 vs 405 cases/year, P = 0.001). In all subgroup analyses, including gender, provoked or unprovoked event and presence or absence of cancer, significant differences between the months of peak and lowest incidence remained. Blood urea nitrogen (BUN)-creatinine ratio was significantly higher in all cases in the peak incidence group compared to the lowest incidence group (24 +/- 1.5 vs 21 +/- 1.6, P = 0.03). In patients with unprovoked VTE (n = 269), levels of BUN and hematocrit were significantly increased in the peak incidence group compared to lowest incidence group (19.5 +/- 0.8 mg/dL vs 16 +/- 1.1 mg/dL, P = 0.03; 39.2 +/- 0.3% vs 37.4 +/- 0.5%, P = 0.01, respectively). Conclusions: The current study demonstrates that occurrence of VTE exhibits monthly variation also existing in patients with provoked events and even in those with cancer. Dehydration is suggested as a potential explanation to the month-related variation in incidence of VTE.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available