4.4 Article

Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio associated with prognosis of lung cancer

Journal

CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages 711-717

Publisher

SPRINGER INT PUBL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s12094-016-1593-y

Keywords

Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio; Prognostic biomarkers; Lung cancer

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose Many studies recently focus on complicated and expensive genomic tests, but the prognostic values of biochemical markers which are easily obtained in clinics are largely overlooked and without further exploration. This study assesses the association of neutrophil-lymphocyte-ratio (NLR) with prognosis of lung cancer patients. Methods In 1032 patients with histologically confirmed lung cancer, the association of pretreatment NLR values with overall survival (OS) was evaluated using a Cox proportional hazards model and the temporal relationship of longitudinal NLR was assessed using a mixed effects model. Results Compared to the patients with a low pretreatment NLR value, those with elevated NLR exhibited a statistically significant worse OS with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.50 (P < 0.0001) after adjusting for age, gender, race, smoking status, drinking status, tumor stage, tumor grade, histology, and treatments. A significant trend of increasing HRs along with increasing NLR values was observed. The increased risk of death conferred by pretreatment NLR values reached a peak level around 2 years after diagnosis. Moreover, in longitudinal analysis, we observed a trend of dramatically increased NLR values in patients who died during follow-up, but stable NLR values in those who were still alive, with a significant interaction of death-alive status with follow-up time (P < 0.0001). Conclusions Elevated NLR is a potential biomarker to identify lung cancer patients with poor prognosis and should be validated in a future clinical trial.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available