4.6 Article

Pathogenic mosaic variants in congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism

Journal

GENETICS IN MEDICINE
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41436-020-0896-0

Keywords

hypogonadotropic hypogonadism; postzygotic mosaicism; copy-number variation; FGFR1; CHD7

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [SNF 310030_173260]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [310030_173260] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose Congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (CHH) is a rare disorder resulting in absent puberty and infertility. The genetic architecture is complex with multiple loci involved, variable expressivity, and incomplete penetrance. The majority of cases are sporadic, consistent with a disease affecting fertility. The current study aims to investigate mosaicism as a genetic mechanism for CHH, focusing on de novo rare variants in CHH genes. Methods We evaluated 60 trios for de novo rare sequencing variants (RSV) in known CHH genes using exome sequencing. Potential mosaicism was suspected among RSVs with altered allelic ratios and confirmed using customized ultradeep sequencing (UDS) in multiple tissues. Results Among the 60 trios, 10 probands harbored de novo pathogenic variants in CHH genes. Custom UDS demonstrated that three of these de novo variants were in fact postzygotic mosaicism-two inFGFR1(p.Leu630Pro and p.Gly348Arg), and one inCHD7(p.Arg2428*). Statistically significant variation across multiple tissues (DNA from blood, buccal, hair follicle, urine) confirmed their mosaic nature. Conclusions We identified a significant number of de novo pathogenic variants in CHH of which a notable number (3/10) exhibited mosaicism. This report of postzygotic mosaicism in CHH patients provides valuable information for accurate genetic counseling.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available